Xinhuanet Beijing, July 3 (Reporter Li Zhiqiang) From July 1, many places began to implement the new year’s housing provident fund deposit policy: the implementation period of the policy of reducing the proportion of enterprise housing provident fund deposit was extended to April 30, 2020, the proportion and upper and lower limits of housing provident fund deposit were standardized, and the upper limit of provident fund deposit base or the upper limit of monthly deposit was adjusted. Enterprises with difficulties in production and operation can apply for reducing the proportion of housing provident fund deposit or delaying payment.

　　Reduce the proportion of enterprise housing provident fund deposit and extend the period

　　Recently, housing provident fund management departments in Beijing, Nanjing, Harbin and other places issued notices to strictly implement the Notice on Improving the Housing Provident Fund Deposit Mechanism to Further Reduce Enterprise Costs issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the Ministry of Finance and the People’s Bank of China in April this year. In order to reduce the cost of the real economy and reduce the non-tax burden of enterprises, the policy of appropriately reducing the proportion of enterprise housing provident fund deposit in stages was extended to April 30, 2020.

　　In April 2016, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Finance and the People’s Bank of China jointly issued a document clarifying that the policy of appropriately reducing the proportion of housing provident fund contributions in stages will be implemented from May 1, 2016, and will be temporarily implemented for two years.

　　Standardize the deposit ratio and upper and lower limits of housing provident fund

　　The notice issued by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development and the Ministry of Finance in April this year once again standardized and adjusted the deposit ratio of housing provident fund and expanded the floating range of the deposit ratio of housing provident fund. The lower limit of the housing provident fund deposit ratio is 5%, and the upper limit is determined by each region according to procedures, but the maximum shall not exceed 12%. The deposit unit can independently determine the proportion of housing provident fund deposit within the upper limit range of 5% to local regulations; Effectively standardize the upper limit of the housing provident fund deposit base. The monthly salary base of local housing provident fund deposit shall not be higher than 3 times the average monthly salary of employees in the previous year published by the statistical department of the city where the employees work. Where more than 3 times, will be standardized and adjusted.

　　According to the spirit of the notice, all localities can be in 12%— 5% within the scope of the upper and lower limits, decide the upper and lower limits of the local provident fund deposit ratio. Across the country, Beijing, Nanjing, Xi ‘an, Qingdao, Yangzhou and other cities have made it clear that the upper and lower limits of the proportion of housing provident fund paid by units and employees themselves are 12%— 5%。 In some areas, the upper and lower limits are limited according to local actual conditions. For example, Jilin province stipulates that the upper and lower limits of the housing provident fund deposit ratio are 7% in principle. Shanghai has made it clear that in 2018, the contribution ratio of employees and units to housing provident fund is 5% to 7% respectively, and units can independently determine the contribution ratio of provident fund within the range of 5% to 7% respectively.

　　Raise the upper limit of the monthly deposit of housing provident fund in many places

　　The upper limit of the monthly deposit of housing provident fund is determined by the upper limit of the deposit base, which is linked to the average salary of employees in the previous year. According to the notice of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development and other three departments, the upper limit of the deposit base of provident funds in various places is three times the average monthly salary of local employees in the previous year.

　　Recently, the housing provident fund management departments in many places have issued notices one after another, clearly stipulating the upper limit of the individual housing provident fund deposit base or the upper limit of the monthly deposit amount in the new provident fund year (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019). If Beijing is clear, the upper limit of the deposit base of housing provident fund in the new year is 25,401 yuan, and the upper limit of the monthly deposit is 6,096 yuan. Guangzhou and Tianjin, both first-tier cities, issued a document clarifying the upper limit of the monthly deposit base of the provident fund, which is 24,654 yuan and 24,240 yuan respectively. Nanjing has made it clear that the upper limit of the provident fund deposit base is 25,300 yuan.

　　With the increase of the average wage of employees in last year, according to statistics, from a national perspective, the upper limit of the monthly deposit of housing provident fund in a few cities such as Beijing, Nanjing, Jinan and Lishui exceeded 6,000 yuan (corresponding to the deposit base of provident fund of 25,000 yuan). Among them, the upper limit of the monthly contribution of the provident fund in Jinan and Lishui exceeds that in Beijing.

　　Enterprises with difficulties in production and operation may apply for reducing the deposit ratio.

　　The housing provident fund management departments in many places issued a notice saying that enterprises with production and operation difficulties that meet the prescribed conditions can apply for reducing the proportion of housing provident fund deposit or delaying the payment of housing provident fund according to procedures.

　　Beijing has clarified the specific conditions for enterprises to apply for reducing the proportion of provident fund deposits or delaying payment. For enterprises with difficulties in production and operation, if there is no workers’ congress or trade union through discussion, with the consent of more than two-thirds of all employees, they can apply for reducing the proportion of housing provident fund deposit or applying for holdover within 1%-4%.

　　According to Shanghai regulations, enterprises with difficulties in production and operation that meet the prescribed conditions may apply for reducing the proportion of housing provident fund deposit or delaying the payment of housing provident fund. Enterprises can apply to reduce the deposit ratio to less than 5%. Enterprises applying for reducing the deposit ratio or holdover of housing provident fund shall be discussed and approved by the workers’ congress or trade union of the unit and apply to the municipal provident fund management center.

　　Tianjin stipulates that enterprises with difficulties in production and operation can apply for reducing the deposit ratio after discussion and approval by the workers’ congress or the workers’ congress (trade union), and the reduction ratio will be adjusted from the current 5% for the unit and 5% for the employees to 1% for the unit and 1% for the employees. At the same time, the requirement of "loss in the previous year" for applying for reducing the proportion will be cancelled.

　　Nanjing stipulates that if it is really difficult for an enterprise to make a deposit, it may reduce the deposit ratio or postpone the payment after being discussed and approved by the workers’ congress or the trade union of the enterprise and audited by the Nanjing Housing Provident Fund Management Center (sub-center). After the economic benefits of the enterprise improve, the deposit ratio will be increased or the deposit will be resumed and the deferred payment will be paid. The minimum deposit ratio shall not be less than 5%.

　　CCTV News:A few days ago, the Emergency Management Department organized an unannounced investigation team to conduct on-the-spot inspections in 14 key provinces and regions to prevent and resolve security risks. Nearly 200 high-risk industries and key units were inspected, and more than 680 hidden dangers of various problems were found, and eight enterprises were ordered to stop production and business.

　　The inspection team found that some local governments have a lot of thunder and enterprises have little rain, and some enterprises have provided the inspection team with work materials that are crammed and patched together temporarily; For the deployment of government-related work, there are problems such as "gradual decline" and "disguised discount", and the work measures are not targeted.

　　The circular pointed out: Shandong Changyi Ludi Iron Mine Co., Ltd. ignored the major safety risks such as the thickness of Quaternary overburden and the possible existence of aquifer in rock mass, and did not study, prevent and take measures against potential risks during self-examination and self-reform.

　　

　　The inspection team found that the concept of safety development in some enterprises is not solid, and the idea of "emphasizing efficiency and neglecting safety" has not been completely changed, and the safety management of some enterprises exists in name only. The circular pointed out: Since September, Qinghai Yihua Chemical Co., Ltd. has had 78 process and gas alarms, and the enterprises have not made a detailed analysis of the causes of frequent alarms, but have become accustomed to them, resulting in alarm devices becoming furnishings.

　　Fujian Meizhou Bay Chlor-Alkali Industry Co., Ltd. added nitrogen sealing facilities to the safety valve of ethylene oxide storage tank according to the requirements of expert guidance service, but closed the nitrogen inlet valve, which made the nitrogen sealing facilities useless.

　　The emergency management departments at Chengde city and county level failed to focus on special law enforcement items in the on-site law enforcement inspection of underground mines and tailings pond enterprises, and law enforcement officers did not find any illegal acts that should have been discovered, such as the lack of examination and approval system for dangerous operations of enterprises, the wrong measurement method for the buried depth of tailings pond infiltration line, and the inability of online monitoring system to give early warning.

　　In view of the problems found in the inspection, the inspection teams have put forward rectification requirements to local governments and relevant departments on the spot. The emergency management department requires all localities and departments to strengthen follow-up supervision and supervision of resumption of production and work after the National Day; Comprehensive use of administrative, legal, market and other means to strengthen the "combination boxing" of safety production supervision; Effectively solve the problem that the grassroots supervision team is not hard in style and lax in supervision, strengthen the implementation of responsibility measures for new risks, and work with relevant departments to eliminate the blind spot of supervision caused by new risks as soon as possible.

Usually, if your pickup truck is a light vehicle, that is, it weighs less than 2 tons, then its high-speed cost will be the same as that of an ordinary car, about 0.5 yuan per kilometer.

However, for non-light pickup trucks, such as the Ford Raptor, the cost will increase, about every kilometer of 1 yuan.

The state has clear regulations on high-speed charging. According to the weight of the vehicle and the number of seats, the charging standard is divided into multiple levels. For example, trucks weighing less than 2 tons and buses with less than 20 seats charge 0.45 yuan per kilometer. For trucks weighing 2 to 7 tons and buses with 21 to 50 seats, the charge per kilometer is 0.90 yuan. For trucks weighing 7 tons to 20 tons, buses with more than 51 seats and sleeper buses, the charge per kilometer is 1.462 yuan. And trucks and container trucks weighing more than 20 tons charge 2.138 yuan per kilometer.

It is worth noting that during holidays, pickup trucks do not enjoy the policy of free passage. Therefore, when planning a long-distance trip, you need to calculate the relevant expenses in advance.

In addition, pickup trucks need to pay attention to some details when driving on the highway. For example, the seat design of super sports cars usually pays more attention to speed than comfort, and long-term driving may cause waist and back pain and affect the driving experience. The pickup truck is more comfortable in this respect, with better shock absorption system and suspension design, which can provide a smoother driving experience.

Another factor to consider is fuel efficiency. Pickup trucks are usually equipped with economical engines and relatively low fuel consumption, which are suitable for long-distance driving. The super sports car pursues the ultimate speed, so it is equipped with a high-power engine, which leads to higher fuel consumption. For example, Bugatti Veyron’s fuel tank capacity can only support about 15 minutes of driving, which requires frequent refueling. In contrast, pickup trucks have larger fuel tank capacity and lower refueling frequency, which is more suitable for long-distance travel.

Finally, the types of gasoline provided by highway gas stations are also different. Super sports cars usually need to be filled with gasoline above 98, while highway gas stations mainly provide gasoline below 97. Using low-grade gasoline may cause damage to the engine of super sports car. Therefore, when traveling long distances, it is recommended to plan the refueling location in advance to ensure that the vehicle can be provided with suitable fuel.