Why did the American president’s car change from Lincoln to Cadillac?


I believe that everyone’s circle of friends was screened by this picture a few days ago. Yes, for this position, two groups of people represented by Trump and Hillary Clinton have been blackmailing each other for nearly 10 months. In several public debates, two prominent high-level people ridiculed and attacked each other, and many scandals were exposed in succession, and this is the position they are vying for-the back seat of Cadillac No.1, which only the President of the United States can sit on.

Yes, now, the American president’s car is a special Cadillac, but in fact, the American president’s love for Cadillac is only in recent decades. If you turn to history, you will find that earlier, brands such as Lincoln were the favorite of the American president, and they all dominated each other for decades. So, what made the change happen? Next, let’s follow Rut Jun and enter the evolution history of the American president’s car to find out.

The President’s First Car-—1909 White Steamer

Of course, when Karl Ben Ci and gottlieb Daimler won the patent right of the world’s first automobile in 1886, the first 20-odd American presidents had no access to automobiles, and they only went out by carriage, and they never drove a car. Until the 25th President William McGinley test-drove Stanley in July, 1901 (it was formally established in 1902, but the first car was built in 1887, an American manufacturer that only produced steam cars. By the early 1920s, cheaper gasoline cars reappeared and gradually occupied the steam car market, and Stanley went bankrupt in 1924).

William McGinley test drive Stanley.
According to the regulations of the Secret Service, the president’s carriage needs bodyguards to follow at all times. After the gradual popularization of cars, the Secret Service specially bought White Motor’s steam car as a escort in 1907. However, Theodore Roosevelt, then president, would rather take a carriage than a car because he wanted to maintain his "rough knight image."

After Theodore Roosevelt refused to run for re-election, William Howard Taft, the 27th president who was hand-picked by him, turned a new page in the White Motor. The original stable was turned into a garage. In 1909, he spent $12,000 (equivalent to $310,000 now) to buy four cars, including two luxury cars, Pierce-Arrow (an American luxury brand, the car of many celebrities), and bought a representative to enter the upper class, and at the same time produced trucks and fire engines.

The first official presidential car-White Steamer

White Motor is a shady American automobile manufacturer, whose products cover trucks, tractors, bicycles, roller skates and sewing machines. Thomas•White, the founder, originally bought a steam car company in Locomobile, but found that the steam engine is extremely dangerous, because the water in nature is soft, and it is easy to form scale on the boiler wall when heated, which will lead to uneven heating and boiler explosion. However, his son Rollin•White made a great improvement, which greatly reduced the probability of explosion. White’s steam car gained good sales, but when the gasoline car gradually counterattacked, White’s center of gravity began to shift, instead of stubbornly hanging himself from a tree. It turns out that they did the right thing.

Although Pierce was originally the president’s official car, when the "engine" of the steam car was running, the thick steam just helped to block the reporter’s camera and questioning. This seven 40-horsepower White Motor became his favorite. Did it have its own destiny with the White House? In fact, this large convertible laid the tone for more than 60 presidents to drive later.

Taft and his family are sitting in White Steamer.

The White House’s First Bulletproof Car-—Packard Twelve Rollson Phaeton


Franklin Roosevelt, one of the most outstanding presidents in American history and the only one who held the presidency for four consecutive years, took over Hoover’s mess during the Great Depression in 1929, and then quickly introduced a series of practical measures to save the country. Therefore, when he ran for the 38th president in 1936, he won 523 of the 531 voter votes, and assumed the post with a super high proportion. But at this time, his car was still a large convertible. At that time, most leaders liked to stand in the convertible and wave to the masses. As the saying goes, there was no shelf to narrow the distance with the masses and improve their support rate. Even Hitler still stood in the Mercedes-Benz convertible after the outbreak of World War II.

Hitler and his Mercedes 770K

In the 1930s, there was a "cylinder number war", and all luxury brands in the United States were gearing up for the top spot. Eight cylinders just came out here, and 12 cylinders were immediately launched there. Cadillac with 16 cylinders finally won the war without smoke, but Packard is still an important part of the American luxury car puzzle. You know, behind Cadillac is GM, behind Lincoln is Ford, and Packard is just an independent luxury car manufacturer.

In 1932, the sales of luxury cars reached 22,000 units, of which 35.6% were Packard and only 16.9% were Cadillac. On the one hand, the price was 500-1,000 dollars lower than that of competitors, and at the same time, it provided luxury as other brands. On the other hand, many versions are derived from a single product line, which greatly reduces the expenses of updating or launching new models from time to time.

Twin Six with graceful atmosphere

As an independent brand, it will not be influenced by other brands under the group, and it does not need to share the losses. In addition, its working method is very flexible, and even it has been transferred to others as a beer production line.

Two years after the end of the Great Depression in 1933, Packard introduced the entry model 120 with a price of less than $1,000, and the sales volume doubled continuously. The reason is also simple. The advanced degree of 120 configuration not only exceeds its own high-end series, but also uses large-scale modern production technology. Under the same labor force as high-end models, the output can be 10 times higher, and high efficiency is not equal to money. However, this move has somewhat affected the brand image.

Packard 120 Coupe

By 1939, Roosevelt customized Twenty Rolls on Phaeton, claiming that the reason for choosing this brand was its reliability and strong power. At this time, many luxury brands founded at the same time had closed down before 1938, and Roosevelt invisibly made a wave of strong advertisements for Packard.

Packard Twelve

Twelve series can be said to represent the highest technological level of Packard. In the 1930s, it was equipped with controllable hydraulic suspension control system and hydraulic brakes, and the natural price was not cheap. The initial price was from $3,650 for a Coupe to $4,395 for a Sedan (now $150,000-$170,000), and then with some customization, the price could rise to the level of Rolls Royce.

The biggest highlight of Rollson is that it is the first American presidential car with bullet-proof body and glass. In 1939, it happened to be the time when World War II broke out. After the Pearl Harbor incident in 1941, the United States announced its participation in the war, and Roosevelt’s other cars were also equipped with bullet-proof armor and glass, which only slightly improved the safety awareness. The problem is that these cars are still convertible models.

Roosevelt’s packard twenty rolls on phaeton

Lessons of Blood-Lincoln Continental SS-100-X

Therefore, a lot of progressive reforms need bloodshed. On November 22nd, 1963, at about 12: 30 noon, the 35th President of the United States, John Kennedy, accompanied by his wife Jacqueline Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connery, was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald in a Lincoln convertible as he drove past Dallas’ Dilly Square. So far, there is no accurate and convincing statement about this incident, and the related witnesses have died strangely, adding a lot of confusing atmosphere to this case.

Before Kennedy took office in 1961, the Secret Service rented the fourth-generation Lincoln Continental convertible from Ford at a price of $500 a year. The biggest reason for choosing the convertible was to let the enthusiastic people see the leaders they supported with their own eyes. In a sense, it was the same as a star meeting, and then fans were more willing to canvass for their idols. At this time, the American car design style is no longer the grandiose aviation style in the 1940s and 1950s, but the "design obeys the function", and the mainland has also changed into a wedge-shaped design (many people think that the aura and feeling of luxury cars are not as good as those in the past, and it is not unreasonable. After so many years of development, car design is now focused on fuel economy or performance, and the previous unrestrained style can only be said that manufacturers all over the world have tried and tried with Americans).

At that time, the car was priced at $7,347 (now $58,000), equipped with a 350-horsepower 7.0L V8 engine (this is only the minimum engine), which was 104 centimeters longer than the original length of 5.4 meters, and then handed over to Hess & Eisenhardt (a refitting factory that provided driving safety for world leaders and served every American president from 1948 to 2001). Including many government agencies in the United States, code-named SS-100-X, but the modification cost of $200,000 (now $1.587 million) only upgraded the comfort configuration, and the safety measures were only handrails for bodyguards to grasp in the trunk, while the so-called double-glazing could be installed in dealers.

This Lincoln has also become the last convertible in the history of the American president’s car. Since then, there has never been such a situation in the United States where the president is sitting in a convertible. After the assassination, Vice President Lyndon Johnson was on the verge of death on Air Force One, and this car continued to serve Johnson until 1967, but it was tempered with a bulletproof roof and thicker armor. The original car was painted black from dark blue, and the "high power" mode could be started in an emergency. The engine will generate more than 17% of the power, and it was not until 1978 (later as a security vehicle) that it retired to hometown and was housed in the Ford Museum in dearborn, Michigan, and quietly accepted the attention of everyone.

SS-100-X from Ford Museum

Learn from one’s mistakes-Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham

In 1981, Ronald Reagan, the 40th president, just took office for 69 days. Just after giving a speech and eating, John hinkley suddenly rushed out to attack Reagan. Although he was shot in the abdomen and lungs, fortunately, he did not pose a threat to his life and recovered quickly, but it is estimated that he has formed a huge psychological shadow on Lincoln.

Lincoln, as the standard of the president, can be traced back to Franklin’s time. As for the reason, it must have something to do with the name "Lincoln". Every president hopes that his achievements in office can reach the height of Abraham Lincoln (however, Lincoln himself was assassinated).

Lincoln’s fifth generation continent at the time of Reagan’s assassination

Although Lincoln mainland had a bulletproof body and roof at this time, after the assassination, he directly replaced it with Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham (the "Fuehrer’s open-top carriage", but Cadillac’s rear roof was changed to leather), and Ice cancelled the roof skylight to ensure all-round safety protection.

This car is equipped with a 135-horsepower 4.1L V8 engine, which is 430 mm longer and 76 mm higher than the original car. It is equipped with armor and bulletproof glass with a thickness of 60 mm. The huge glass area is like a mobile greenhouse. In order to withstand such a large weight, the tires and wheels have of course been upgraded.

At that time, many people thought that the presidential car in a 1993 movie "Sniper by Firewire" (also the story of the assassination of the president) was the original car, because the model made in the movie was so elaborate, but when you think about it, it is impossible. As a state secret, every presidential car is either taken back to the museum or completely destroyed after retirement, and it is impossible to borrow it as a movie prop.

Reagan’s Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham

Trembling-Cadillac One

In the next 30 years, only George H.W. Bush chose Lincoln, and all others were Cadillac. Obama’s Cadillac One-"The Beast" was also brought to China during the G20 Summit in Hangzhou some time ago. Later, the media basically interpreted everything that civilians could know, such as the modeling based on DTS, the grille of CTS and the headlights of Escalade. In terms of power, there is no specific data on the weight of 8.1L V8 gasoline engine or 6.6L turbocharged V8 diesel engine, but it is definitely not light from the Goodyear RHS tire, because this type of tire is usually used for medium and heavy trucks. The safety measures are undoubtedly the best in the past. The 55mm bullet-proof glass (only the main driver can lift it to pay the toll), the steel plate of the car body is 127mm thick, and there is no keyhole in the whole car. Even how to open the door is a secret.

In addition, it is equipped with tear gas throwing equipment, shotguns and other weapons. When attacked by howitzers or anti-tank missiles, the car can also launch multi-spectral infrared smoke bombs to interfere. Even if the president is attacked, the oxygen supply system, fire extinguishing system and the president’s exclusive blood reserve are all available.

The above interpretation seems to have narrowed the distance between the American president’s car and the Chinese people, but this situation is not expected to happen in the future, because Trump’s new car will be unveiled at the inauguration ceremony on January 20 next year, and the "beast" will become history.

We only focus on the production of original car content. If you want to know more about cars, you can subscribe to our WeChat WeChat official account: Rut (ID: CARTRACKS). At present, hundreds of thousands of fans have gathered, waiting for you!

(Article source: Rutting Yu Jianliang)

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

[Original of Truck House] Although it is very tiring to pull Lutong, because Lutong vehicles can avoid high-speed tolls, if you pull Lutong goods, the freight can earn more. However, we need to remind card friends that high-speed is not free in the following situations.

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

A car full of oysters declared green pass at the exit of the high-speed toll station. But the green pass inspector found thatoysterThey are all connected in series with nylon ropes, which are obviously oyster seedlings for breeding. The toll collector told the driver that he could not enjoy the green pass reduction policy.

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

Oyster seedlings are seafood, too. Why can’t they be free? Because "cultured seedlings do not belong to the variety scope of the National Expressway Green Passage" Catalogue of Fresh Agricultural Products ",they cannot enjoy the Green Pass reduction and exemption policy."

After a pickup truck carrying razor clams drove into the toll booth, the toll collector found that there was no cargo at the tail of the truck. On the whole, the shipment of razor clams only accounted for 70%, and the weight of the cargo did not reach 80% of the vehicle’s nuclear load.

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

According to the data, the total weight of the vehicle cargo is 2.04 tons, and the total weight of the vehicle cargo needs to reach 2.19 tons according to the driving license. Because the cargo space and nuclear load did not meet the requirements of the free range, the driver had to pay all the high-speed tolls.

One car is declared as a green pass, but the toll collector.Open the car door,I saw all the sacks full of goods, and one or two sacks on the outermost side were snails, but the other bagsIt’s all shell feed for crabs.

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

Because this is a carYou can’t use the green pass free policy for mixed vehicles.

A truck full of pigs asked for free release. However, during the actual inspection, it was found that all the big pigs were loaded on the car, which should be taken to the slaughterhouse for slaughter.

Pay attention to these situations. High speed is not free.

According to the latest national regulations, pigs slaughtered do not belong to the free agricultural products stipulated in the Green Passage Policy for Fresh Agricultural Products Transportation, so they cannot enjoy the Green Pass free policy.

●  Postscript

The state has regulations on the products of Lutong. If they are not in the product catalogue, card friends still have to make up all the tolls. In addition, even if you are pulling the goods of Green Link, if the weight and space of the goods can’t reach the free standard, you should also charge the full toll. Therefore, if card friends pull the goods, they must talk to the owner in advance.

Ancient Rome and Alexandria were both called empires. Why shouldn’t Qin, Han, Tang and Qing dynasties be called empires? (below)

  If the empire is understood as a conquest system composed of suzerain and conquered areas, then China has never been an empire. China established a unified centralized country in the Qin Dynasty. Although Ying Zheng claimed to be the "emperor", this unified country was not an empire. China has been the vertical rule of the county system since the Qin Dynasty. All officials are appointed by the imperial court, and there is no entrusted management. As Han Feizi said, China’s ancient state structure is "everything is in the four directions, and it should be in the central government, and the saints should insist on it, and the four directions should be effective". After Qin destroyed the six countries, the whole country was divided into thirty-six counties. From then on, the central government of China was not composed of localities, but was divided by the central government. The central government precedes the local government in logic and time. All the ruling power of the country comes from the central government, and the local government does not have any inherent power. The place is the agency of the central government, and the central government is "like an arm, like an armband" to the place. Therefore, there has never been an empire in the history of China, and the concept of empire has never appeared in the language and writing of China.

  ▲ The situation map of the Qin Dynasty. (Source: Outline of Chinese and Foreign History)

  ▲ Situation map of the Western Han Dynasty. (Source: Outline of Chinese and Foreign History)

  ▲ The map of the territory and frontier nationalities in the early Tang Dynasty (669 years). (Source: Outline of Chinese and Foreign History)

  At the same time, the ancient Central Plains civilization in China also promoted the homogenization within the unified country. The ancient Central Plains civilization in China is a powerful cultural soft power to attract and integrate the surrounding ethnic groups. Mencius called it "changing foreigners with summer". After the Han Dynasty, people often use Sinicization to explain the process of homogenization of unified China by Central Plains civilization. This is also fundamentally different from the empire where various heterogeneous civilizations coexist.

  ▲清朝疆域图(1820年)。(图片来源:《中外历史纲要》)

  如上所述,在西方政治话语和学术语言中,帝国是一个由中央地带与从属地带共同组成的征服体系。如果把中国古代王朝的强盛时期称之为帝国,就意味着中国在古代曾经是一个征服体系。西方一些学者常常把中国的清王朝称之为帝国,认为清王朝的疆域是一个征服了多个领土、多个民族的多层次体系,疆域内各个民族、各个地区都是帝国的板块,只是暂时被清王朝用武力所统治。按照这种观点,清王朝崩溃以后,帝国的一些板块就应当独立出去,就像当年沙皇俄国崩溃以后,各个板块独立出去一样。所以,如果承认清王朝是帝国,就意味着中国的边疆是被清王朝征服的,清王朝一旦崩溃,这些由不同种族构成的边疆地区就应当独立出去。这也是为什么一些西方人支持中国的西藏、新疆独立的原因之一。所以,中国在清代不是一个帝国,这不仅是一个理论问题,而且也是一个重要的现实问题。

  ▲ Schematic diagram of the Western Zhou Dynasty. (Source: Outline of Chinese and Foreign History)

  ▲ Map of the Warring States Period. (Source: Outline of Chinese and Foreign History)

  In China academic circles, some scholars have seriously discussed the concept of empire. But even among some scholars who try to clarify the concept of empire, there are still some vague understandings. For example, some scholars denied that there had been an empire in China since the Qin and Han Dynasties, but they still understood the Zhou Dynasty before the Qin Dynasty as an empire, on the grounds that the Zhou Dynasty’s local rule was not direct, but indirect, which was similar to the western empire. In fact, this is also an inaccurate understanding of the political structure of the Zhou Dynasty. There is no doubt that the centralized political structure of the Zhou Dynasty is fundamentally different from that of the Qin and Han Dynasties. But this difference is not the difference between an empire and a centralized dynasty, but the difference between a feudal system and centralization of authority.

  The Zhou Dynasty in history was not a conquest system, but a enfeoffment system formed by the supreme ruler Zhou Tianzi. Within this system, more than 70 feudal vassal States were not conquered and established by the Zhou Dynasty, but were enfeoffed by the Zhou Dynasty according to the merits of being close to each other and defeating the Shang Dynasty. The people of these vassal States were all Chinese. The national political structure of China in the Zhou Dynasty was similar to the feudal system in the Middle Ages in Western Europe, but it was fundamentally different from western empires, such as Alexandria and Rome.

  What needs to be clarified is that in history, China’s national structure seems to be similar to that of western empires in some aspects. In the history after Qin and Han Dynasties, China’s imperial court sometimes ruled the border areas loosely, and sometimes it ruled indirectly instead of directly. For example, the chieftain system in the remote areas of China once existed widely, which was called "Jimi system" in ancient times. If ancient China was not an empire, how can we understand that this national structure is similar to the empire?

  Personally, I think the most fundamental difference is that China’s idea of unification is totally incompatible with the idea of empire. China’s national construction has a set of political ideas, political theories and a political belief, which is China’s idea of great unification. This idea mainly comes from Legalists and Confucianists, although the two most influential schools in China often argue with each other. China’s system since Qin Dynasty is Confucianism, and the basic framework and system of the country are based on the principle of Legalism, which is embodied in the centralized county system, which is called "the political system of Qin Dynasty is practiced in all generations"; Confucianism, on the other hand, provides the society with general ethics and moral norms, maintains the relationship between people, and also regulates the relationship between monarch and minister.

  There is indeed a real problem here. In ancient times, it was really difficult for the central government to implement unified vertical rule in a huge territory. Due to the low productivity in ancient times, such as the level of material development, traffic roads and tools are very backward. This has indeed caused great difficulties to the unified national governance. In the political centers of ancient China, such as Chang ‘an, Luoyang and Peking, it was difficult to implement vertical rule in the border areas. It takes several months to go to Beijing from Guizhou, Yunnan, and vertical management is of course very difficult. However, after Qin and Han Dynasties, unification has become the consensus of Confucianism and Legalism. So from the Qin and Han dynasties, a new system was used — — To manage the border areas by the system of detention. The system of detention is an expedient measure. When the central government is unable to reach the local level and has no way to directly rule, it can temporarily give the place of detention autonomy, similar to the empire’s rule over the conquered place. The system of detention is relatively loose, such as the toast system in the ancient frontier areas of China. You can manage yourself by paying tribute and being loyal to the court.

  ▲ The Hailongtun Tusi Site in Zunyi, Guizhou Province is listed as a world cultural heritage. It is an important place for Tusi Yang in Gubo Prefecture, and witnessed the heyday of the Tusi system. (Source: vision china)

  So, does this mean that the detention system is the same as imperial rule? In fact, the difference is very big. China’s thought of unification has been deeply rooted in people’s hearts since Qin and Han Dynasties. Due to the constraints of realistic conditions, the central government can give local governments a lot of autonomy at some time, but these autonomy rights are by no means inherent in local governments. The central government can grant local governments a great deal of autonomy, but because the source of law lies in the central government, the central government has the right to take it back when conditions are ripe. This is the change of soil into the stream in the history of China. This is not the same as the empire. China’s thought of unification has penetrated into the marrow of rulers and literati, and is the core of China’s political culture.

  Therefore, for more than two thousand years, China’s detention system is a supplement to the centralized unified system, and the central government has unified all the territories through a set of very complicated and elaborate designs. Sometimes, ancient China looks like an empire on the surface, and even some frontier areas have greater autonomy than the subordinate areas of the empire. However, in China, all the power in the border areas is granted by the central authorities, not the local authorities, and the local authorities have no inherent power. That is to say, the unified county system has never been a conquest system outside the country, although it can’t fail to reach the surrounding boundaries for a while. For the central court, all the border areas have been brought into the unified national framework.

  Therefore, from the formal point of view, there are essential differences between the system of imprisonment and the imperial system under the framework of China’s ancient unification. I think it’s necessary to distinguish between the empire and the fetter system in our history. If we don’t make a distinction, it will cause great confusion and threaten the state structure of China now. Of course, the comparative study of the captive system and the imperial system still needs a lot of work, which requires a lot of detailed analysis.

  About the author:

  Han Zhu, director of Shangdao Society Research Institute, researcher of China Research Institute of Fudan University, and columnist of Observer Network. In the 1980s, he taught western philosophy in China universities. In the early 1990s, he did research on comparative politics and the development of contemporary China in new york University and Columbia University. He has published works such as China Power and Historical Genes of China Road.

  Producer | Yang Xinhua

  Overall planning | Hu Jun, Liu Jia

  Writing | Yang Chao

  Editor | Guo Hui

  Production | Hu Qi